Εναρμονισμός αντιφάσεων = Death

I have it on good authority that Akis is preparing another masterpiece for discussion, but in the mean time I will like to address some of Dimitris comments, not all. I will like to leave the “Rights of Man” for a later date, when we have built up a more firm base and a better understanding of each others point of view. Nor would I delve too much into “freedom is a State of Mind” because I do not believe that that is what I meant, let alone create another dogmatic belief. My intent was to open our minds to infinite possibilities and not to create a dogmatic anything. Dogmas close minds by setting boundaries.

I would however take exception to, and deal with that last paragraph that “As for Jesus, may I suggest that he used his own freedom to express his belief about what others should be slaves to”?

In my piece “Element of Confusion” I stated that one of our fundamental scientific laws is that “action and reaction are equal and opposite” and that same law is reflected in religious teachings as “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” meaning that even in the spiritual realm, if I could describe the non material plane dimensions as the spiritual realm, our actions or even thoughts being energy forms, have equal and opposite consequences.
Prior to Jesus, this law described the inescapable state of the human condition. The continuous and endless struggle in dealing with action and reaction or as Akis will say the struggle for the “ΕΝΑΡΜΟΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΑΝΤΙΦΑΣΕΩΝ”, was the accepted state of mans existence.
Jesus interpreted that condition as the unending cycle of death or the gradual loss of mans recollection and ultimate realization of his true self and his divine origin.
Jesus fundamentally proposed that through “absolute love” that law which kept man enslaved to the material plane and perpetual death becomes null and void. In my understanding this is liberation and not enslavement.